Stream: committers
Topic: add ‘unknown' to AllergyIntolerance.reaction.certainty?
Rob Hausam (Aug 06 2016 at 14:54):
GF#10369 - PCWG voted to add 'unknown' to AllergyIntolerance.reaction.certainty (reaction-event-certainty value set). Some use cases are described for explicitly documenting as 'unknown' vs. omitting the element. OK to add this code?
Grahame Grieve (Aug 06 2016 at 22:02):
how is unknown different to just not providing a certainty?
Grahame Grieve (Aug 06 2016 at 22:02):
it's getting pretty late for this now.
Grahame Grieve (Aug 06 2016 at 22:48):
@Bryn Rhodes @Eric Haas @Rick Geimer - anyone prolfiling this?
Rob Hausam (Aug 07 2016 at 00:21):
@Grahame Grieve Agree it's relatively late - just checking to see if it's reasonable to add now vs. wait. The GF#10369 discussion gives the rationale for why PCWG and the Netherlands would like to have this explicitly included in the value set.
Bryn Rhodes (Aug 07 2016 at 03:47):
QI-Core is profiling AllergyIntolerance, but we don't explicitly reference that element, so the change wouldn't affect QI-Core.
Eric Haas (Aug 08 2016 at 00:21):
affect DAF but we have had a chance to review this with the implementors
Rob Hausam (Aug 08 2016 at 01:56):
@Eric Haas So DAF would be OK with the change, then?
Eric Haas (Aug 08 2016 at 05:51):
I think it should be not be added before the ballot.
Grahame Grieve (Aug 08 2016 at 11:48):
there you go. have to after the ballot, but you could add a ballot note
Rob Hausam (Aug 08 2016 at 14:54):
ok - will add a ballot note
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
