Stream: committers
Topic: Workflow Definition pattern and MetadataResource
Bryn Rhodes (Feb 21 2018 at 19:15):
I've been reviewing the workflow report for the CDS and CQI resources and determining changes to be made, and some of them are inconsistent with the MetadataResource, which makes me think we ought to get the MetadataResource in sync with the Definition pattern before applying these changes to the knowledge resources, yes? @Lloyd McKenzie
Grahame Grieve (Feb 21 2018 at 19:39):
what's not consistent?
Bryn Rhodes (Feb 21 2018 at 19:43):
1) identifier in MetadataResource is 0..*, the Definition pattern is 0..1
2) Definition.performerType overlaps with useContext[code=user]
3) publisher in MetadataResource is a string, should be aligned with Definition.publisher
4) derivedFrom, partOf, and replaces are all things that MetadataResource would benefit from
Grahame Grieve (Feb 21 2018 at 19:45):
1. might be an issue with the definition pattern - no need for changes in metadataresource
2. I don't think there's a connection between those
3. I think that's sufficient alignment
4. could be
Bryn Rhodes (Feb 21 2018 at 19:49):
Those sound reasonable, but then I think the Definition pattern is too workflow'y :)
Bryn Rhodes (Feb 21 2018 at 19:51):
In other words, if a resource aligns with MetadataResource, I wouldn't expect the Workflow Report to give warnings about those things.
Lloyd McKenzie (Feb 21 2018 at 19:55):
MetaDataResource and Definition are two different views on a resource. Possible to be aligned with one and not the other.
Bryn Rhodes (Feb 21 2018 at 20:22):
That's fair, perhaps I've tried to apply the brush too broadly. Would you agree that Measure is a Definition resource though?
Lloyd McKenzie (Feb 21 2018 at 20:59):
I think so
Lloyd McKenzie (Feb 21 2018 at 20:59):
We've classified it as such at the moment :)
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
