Stream: committers
Topic: FMM applied
John Moehrke (Mar 06 2017 at 13:10):
My understanding was that the committees would do their QA check using the FMM and speadsheet. By registering their assessment and FMM in that spreadsheet; that their resource would get marked with that FMM. Yet a week later and the Resources are still at zero. Was this my misunderstanding? Or is there some process (@Grahame Grieve ) that is yet to happen?
Lloyd McKenzie (Mar 06 2017 at 16:01):
The spreadsheet is expected to be updated as of the end of this week. The FMG will then review it, double-check against warnings in the build, etc. At that point, the FMM levels will be propagated into the build for publication purposes
John Moehrke (Mar 06 2017 at 16:14):
okay... I was seeing other resource FMM change, so I was wondering about the procedure.
Lloyd McKenzie (Mar 06 2017 at 19:31):
You can edit the fhir.ini if you like, but whatever you put there will get overridden based on the FMG assessment of the spreadsheet in about a week's time.
John Moehrke (Mar 06 2017 at 19:39):
thanks. It would be best if we all moved at the same time, using the same system. I am getting all kinds of feedback about current build showing FMM seemingly random values. Would be better if they were all stuck at 0 until FMG action.
Grahame Grieve (Mar 06 2017 at 19:55):
next time round, I will ensure that both current and aspired levels are shown. Setting the levels to 0 conveys strong messages to implementers that are wrong
John Moehrke (Mar 06 2017 at 20:06):
I agree... but everyone got thrown to zero, and I have left them at zero waiting for process to bring them back. Others clearly went ahead of process and self-promoted their desired FMM.
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
