FHIR Chat · Ballot Preparation · committers

Stream: committers

Topic: Ballot Preparation


view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Aug 02 2018 at 04:02):

Reminder to all editors: 10 days till Core is frozen. I'd appreciate it if you make substantiative changes ASAP - I have to start focusing on IGs next week, and instability in the core will hurt...

view this post on Zulip Lloyd McKenzie (Aug 02 2018 at 04:06):

More specifically, core is frozen to substantive change at end of day on Aug. 10. Non-substantive change is still permitted until the 17th.

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Aug 02 2018 at 04:07):

that's not what the ballot prep on the wiki says:

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Aug 02 2018 at 04:07):

FHIR Core is frozen, limited QA process for content subject to ballot only

view this post on Zulip Lloyd McKenzie (Aug 02 2018 at 04:14):

Hmm. So it does. Not sure why we made that different than usual. Is there a concern about non-substantive change to core during the final week?

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Aug 02 2018 at 04:18):

well, we do usually do this, but the core closes s a week earlier.

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Aug 02 2018 at 12:32):

I added a rule because of a task: "should" must be uppercase. we have somewhere >500 violations....

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Aug 02 2018 at 12:32):

i've disabled the rule.

view this post on Zulip Lloyd McKenzie (Aug 02 2018 at 14:21):

Do we have a reminder to bring it back?

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Aug 02 2018 at 18:49):

not at this time. it'll be an R5 thing

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Aug 06 2018 at 05:37):

@Bryn Rhodes I am assigning GF#11305 to you

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Aug 06 2018 at 06:30):

I'm not really clear quite what words should be used for GF#14231

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Aug 06 2018 at 06:34):

@Brett Marquard GF#11246 is still assigned to you

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Aug 06 2018 at 06:56):

@Rick Geimer I changed the Composition.class to Composition.category. I also renamed the class search parameter to category. We can reverse that if it's not the intent from SD

view this post on Zulip Brett Marquard (Aug 06 2018 at 15:10):

In February, I improved the guidance we had on the wiki. Should this be integrated into extensibility page or referenced?

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Aug 06 2018 at 19:01):

I'll make sure it's referenced

view this post on Zulip Brett Marquard (Aug 06 2018 at 20:23):

Thanks, sorry for not getting back to you

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Aug 06 2018 at 21:30):

@Lloyd McKenzie do you know of any examples for GF#16955? (I'm particularly interested in what character value a 'non-breaking space' is...

view this post on Zulip Lloyd McKenzie (Aug 06 2018 at 21:46):

Character is   I don't actually remember where I encountered it unfortunately.

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Aug 06 2018 at 21:50):

I think zulip trashed that char - what unicode value ?

view this post on Zulip Lloyd McKenzie (Aug 06 2018 at 22:09):

Hex A0

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Aug 06 2018 at 22:10):

thx

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Aug 07 2018 at 23:00):

@Bryn Rhodes Missing IsModifierReason on MeasureReport.improvementNotation

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Aug 07 2018 at 23:01):

@John Moehrke @Rick Geimer Missing IsModifierReason on DocumentReference.relatesTo ?

view this post on Zulip Bryn Rhodes (Aug 08 2018 at 00:48):

@Grahame Grieve not sure I know how to provide this, I'm looking at other resources that have modifiers and I don't see a way to say what the modifier reason is?

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Aug 08 2018 at 01:19):

status is handled specially. Column is called "Modifier Reason"

view this post on Zulip John Moehrke (Aug 08 2018 at 21:44):

why would DocumentReference.relatesTo be a modifier?

view this post on Zulip Lloyd McKenzie (Aug 08 2018 at 22:11):

My guess is if it says "replaced by" - though in principle that should already be covered by the status.

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Aug 08 2018 at 22:12):

I don't think it should be a modifier

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Aug 09 2018 at 07:54):

I think that inv-1 on http://build.fhir.org/extension-allergyintolerance-substanceexposurerisk.html is trying to be a context invariant (http://build.fhir.org/structuredefinition-definitions.html#StructureDefinition.contextInvariant) ? But it's presented as a normal invariant? (there's probably no way to make something a context invariant right now...)

view this post on Zulip Rob Hausam (Aug 09 2018 at 11:39):

I don't recall that contextInvariant existed when I wrote it (or if it did, I didn't know about it), but, yes, I agree that is the intent. So we do have contextInvariant that would apply in this case, but we don't have a way to use it?

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Aug 09 2018 at 11:57):

I'll see about making it a context invariant

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Aug 10 2018 at 07:20):

hi editors - substantiative freeze is close. officially, it's less that 24 hours from now, but in practice, it's about 48 hours away: that's when I'm going to sit down and start finalising the collateral. So any changes after 48 hours from now have to non--substantial.

view this post on Zulip John Moehrke (Aug 10 2018 at 14:33):

SHould I create a task to remove the modifier flag from DocumentReference.relatesTo? I don't think this is a modifier element, it does exactly what th element says it does and nothing more. As indicated status should be the only modifier... or did someone else create tat tracker?

view this post on Zulip Lloyd McKenzie (Aug 10 2018 at 14:35):

I haven't seen a tracker for that. I think it's a reasonable thing to fix.

view this post on Zulip John Moehrke (Aug 10 2018 at 14:47):

done GF#17655 -- can we get this quickly approved? I am not sure StructDoc meet in time.

view this post on Zulip Lloyd McKenzie (Aug 10 2018 at 14:48):

Just pre-apply it

view this post on Zulip Lloyd McKenzie (Aug 10 2018 at 14:49):

Resource is non-normative, so you can undo if necessary and it's a pretty non-controversial fix

view this post on Zulip John Moehrke (Aug 10 2018 at 14:49):

okay. I will do that as soon as I can get a build working


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC