Stream: social
Topic: registry.fhir.org
Grahame Grieve (Sep 21 2017 at 22:11):
http://registry.fhir.org is now operational, and in a prototype/evaluation mode. Please feel free to use it - we will reset the content soon and call it live
in the meantime, there's a new stream 'registry.fhir.org' here for comment/discussion/issue reports
redixint (Sep 21 2017 at 22:43):
@Grahame Grieve Good to know that we have one registry for extensions, profiles, etc. However, I am wondering if you can show us a list of the conformance servers that you used for such purpose.
Grahame Grieve (Sep 21 2017 at 22:50):
I'm not sure what you mean 'conformance servers that I used for such purpose'?
redixint (Sep 21 2017 at 22:56):
When I did a search in this site, the results are coming from various conformance servers, e.g., hl7.org, opencimi.org, fhir.de, etc. So, I am wondering if you send the user's inquiry to various conformance servers for the results?
Grahame Grieve (Sep 21 2017 at 22:57):
no. when user's upload content to registry.fhir.org, or make it available through simplifier.net, the registry tracks where the master source is, and provides users with a link back to the master source
redixint (Sep 21 2017 at 23:04):
Thank you for the clarification. When entering "OptumPractitioner", I got nothing returned. In simplifier.net, I am sure it is there. Can you check it?
Grahame Grieve (Sep 21 2017 at 23:27):
please ask in registry.fhir.org stream, where the system maintainers will watch for issue reporrts
John Moehrke (Sep 22 2017 at 14:35):
I am expecting that we need to explicitly submit our work to the fhir.org registry? Or is everything on Simplifier automatically registered?
Grahame Grieve (Sep 22 2017 at 21:04):
things on simplifier are not automatically registered, you have to deliberately expose them in the registry.
Grahame Grieve (Sep 22 2017 at 21:04):
but doing so is easy
Todd Cooper (Sep 23 2017 at 01:07):
Which is a good thing ... we are looking forward to a "clean slate", selectively pulling over what makes sense with our draft PoCD IG.
Kevin Mayfield (Sep 23 2017 at 16:49):
How would we get a profile removed from simplifier, I just noticed a couple of UK profiles that were added for development reasons.
Grahame Grieve (Sep 23 2017 at 20:29):
@Christiaan Knaap ?
Rien Wertheim (Sep 24 2017 at 11:40):
@Mirjam Baltus
Kevin Mayfield (Sep 24 2017 at 12:20):
FYI. The correct profiles are on https://fhir-test.hl7.org.uk/ and https://fhir.nhs.uk/ Believe these to be work in progress and not authoritive (especially the hl7.org.uk).
Richard Kavanagh (Sep 24 2017 at 20:05):
Hmm. That's worrying. I would have thought that explicit permission would have been needed to put Furore data onto an HL7 server. We definitely do not want any of our profiles in the FHIR registry (At least at this point).
Grahame Grieve (Sep 25 2017 at 03:40):
well, that's why we're in a shake down period. I believe that the current policy is that anything you have published on simplifier is available through the registry
Richard Kavanagh (Sep 25 2017 at 10:01):
@Grahame Grieve an interesting perspective. What if we don't want to place things on the FHIR Registry but still want to use Simplifier? I guess we'll need to think a little more carefully where we expose things going forwards.
Grahame Grieve (Sep 25 2017 at 10:20):
The FhIR
Grahame Grieve (Sep 25 2017 at 10:22):
The FHIR foundation - and me - have said that it must be possible for authors of content on simplified to choose to publish the content on registry.fhir.org. We haven't made any requirements on how, and that's part of what's shaking out now. Furore might want to comment further
Mirjam Baltus (Sep 25 2017 at 10:32):
@Kevin Mayfield If you look at the profile on Simplifier.net, you can click on the project it belongs to. Then click on the 'members' tab to see who can author the profiles for that project. Those authors can remove the profiles.
Kevin Mayfield (Sep 25 2017 at 10:47):
Thanks. The profiles we had uploaded we're removed this morning. We had wanted to see how the profile was rendered.
Martijn Harthoorn (Sep 25 2017 at 10:49):
Originally, the plan was to only expose on the registry that what is status='active' and milestoned (marked as finished by the user). But we have also contemplated having an active check(box) allowing you to opt-in or out, on a project or resource level.
Martijn Harthoorn (Sep 25 2017 at 10:50):
When we realized that the FHIR core resources were still in draft, we decided to show everything that is not a test project.
Martijn Harthoorn (Sep 25 2017 at 10:52):
In the future, I believe that we should go back to filtering on content that is marked as finished in some way.
Brian Reinhold (Sep 26 2017 at 21:30):
`I have a lot of duplicates in there. How do I make sure only the latest is present? I thought when I deleted them from Simplifier they would be gone...
Martijn Harthoorn (Sep 27 2017 at 11:30):
Brian: you can delete a resource from your project in Simplifier. It should be gone after that, If not, then give me some specifics, and we can take a look.
Martijn Harthoorn (Sep 27 2017 at 11:31):
registry.fhir.org currently shows content from all projects. And we are still working on a system to make sure that only the valid becomes visible.
Ewout Kramer (Sep 27 2017 at 11:55):
@Martijn Harthoorn : by using the project settings in Simplifier to make it a "test" project, you can also make sure your profiles don't show up, right?
Martijn Harthoorn (Sep 27 2017 at 12:30):
Yes. Currently we filter out test projects.
John Moehrke (Sep 27 2017 at 14:15):
I was expecting that I would need to specify that I wanted my project to be pushed to registry.fhir.org; but it seems all of my projects have been pushed over there? I don't think any harm is done, but this is NOT what I was told would happen.
Eric Haas (Sep 27 2017 at 15:13):
Can we move the registry chat to #registry.fhir.org so is not lost here?
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
