FHIR Chat · Metadata Registry · social

Stream: social

Topic: Metadata Registry


view this post on Zulip Lin Zhang (Mar 10 2021 at 13:18):

Is it possible to use a FHIR server as an ISO 11179 compatible Metadata Registry (MDR) ?

view this post on Zulip Lloyd McKenzie (Mar 10 2021 at 16:46):

Take a look at the SDC-DE IG. (Note that there's been no work on this for quite some time.)

view this post on Zulip John Moehrke (Mar 10 2021 at 18:49):

The IHE QRPH domain has some work relative to Structured Data Capture (SDC) and ISO 11179. https://www.ihe.net/uploadedFiles/Documents/QRPH/IHE_QRPH_Suppl_SDC.pdf
also
https://www.ihe.net/uploadedFiles/Documents/QRPH/IHE_QRPH_Suppl_DEX.pdf
I don't know what they have done relative to FHIR.

view this post on Zulip Lin Zhang (Mar 10 2021 at 23:46):

@Lloyd McKenzie @John Moehrke Thanks. Theoretically, at least a terminology server could do so. And some people reported such an approach but I don't remember it.

view this post on Zulip Lloyd McKenzie (Mar 11 2021 at 00:13):

Terminology server wouldn't be good about exposing data types, cardinality constraints, terminology bindings, etc. Data elements are really not the same as codes. In FHIR, you best represent them using ElementDefinition (and collections of them, including singleton collections) using StructureDefinition.

view this post on Zulip Lin Zhang (Mar 11 2021 at 00:21):

@Lloyd McKenzie Appreciate that. I will read these materials @John Moehrke and you mentioned.


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC