FHIR Chat · February 2020 Connectathon · cds hooks

Stream: cds hooks

Topic: February 2020 Connectathon


view this post on Zulip Dennis Patterson (Nov 14 2019 at 22:37):

Hi everyone!

The HL7 FHIR Connectathon in Sydney is coming up quickly and I'm working on defining the CDS Hooks track scenarios. I'll be bringing Cerner's CDS Client implementation, as well.

I wanted to invite anyone planning to bring or work on a CDS Client or Service implementation to reach out to me. We'll be having scenarios around implementing the 1.0 spec, but touching base will help with knowing attendance plans, use-cases, and gauging interest for additional scenarios.

view this post on Zulip Dennis Patterson (Nov 14 2019 at 22:40):

You can chime in directly here, as well!

view this post on Zulip Dennis Patterson (Dec 04 2019 at 22:44):

For posterity, here's the Sydney track definition - https://confluence.hl7.org/display/FHIR/2020-02+CDS+Hooks+Track

It includes scenarios covering the 1.0 specification, plus a scenario around incorporating SMART Web Messaging for interested parties

view this post on Zulip Dennis Patterson (Jan 10 2020 at 16:14):

Planning on coming to the Connectathon in Sydney? I have two forms for you to complete:

  1. Pre-Connectathon Survey to help event organizers with planning and per-track space allocation.

  2. CDS Hooks Track technical registration spreadsheet - This helps communicate your endpoints, indicate interested hooks, and express what you're wanting to test so we can start fostering connections and any early integration steps. You're also welcome to add your name and return later with additional details.

Looking forward to seeing everybody!

view this post on Zulip Dennis Patterson (Jan 17 2020 at 20:39):

I updated the track page with an Orientation call next week. It'll be on Thursday, January 23rd at 3pm central / Friday, January 24th at 8am AEDT.

If you're unable to make the call, please sync up with me and/or make sure you're registered for the event using the links above. I want to make sure your questions get answered and that we can start integrating before the event to ensure a profitable time. Thanks!

view this post on Zulip JP (Feb 01 2020 at 22:19):

I added a couple endpoints to the registration spreadsheet. The services provided are recommendations 10 and 11 from the CDS Opioid Prescribing Guidelines IG located here:

http://build.fhir.org/ig/cqframework/opioid-cds/index.html

There are sample Patient resources at that link as well.

view this post on Zulip Isaac Vetter (Feb 01 2020 at 23:48):

DXE's FHIR metadata url: http://ohcconnect.myhealthpoc.com:9094/org1

view this post on Zulip Isaac Vetter (Feb 02 2020 at 22:24):

@Brett Esler - do you have a CDS client/EHR available this weekend?

view this post on Zulip Isaac Vetter (Feb 02 2020 at 23:20):

Some endpoints are here

view this post on Zulip Isaac Vetter (Feb 03 2020 at 00:18):

@Michele Mottini - do you only support DSTU2 on your CDS service? Anything with STU3 or R4?

view this post on Zulip Isaac Vetter (Feb 03 2020 at 00:22):

Hey @Jonathan Percival - can you look into this error?

ca.uhn.fhir.parser.DataFormatException: Invalid attribute value "Male": Unknown AdministrativeGender code 'Male'

view this post on Zulip Michele Mottini (Feb 03 2020 at 00:29):

static-patient-greeter is now R4

view this post on Zulip Michele Mottini (Feb 03 2020 at 00:29):

(it is a config switch)

view this post on Zulip Michele Mottini (Feb 03 2020 at 00:30):

patient-view-dstu2-patient-data-write is only DSTU2 at the moment

view this post on Zulip Michele Mottini (Feb 03 2020 at 00:51):

There should maybe be a way in the cds discovery to declare which FHIR version is supported by each hook?

view this post on Zulip Michele Mottini (Feb 03 2020 at 00:52):

Or it is sort of assumed that all should support the same version?

view this post on Zulip Isaac Vetter (Feb 03 2020 at 01:34):

Hey @Jonathan Percival - it looks like Male is actually the appropriate code ... -- https://www.hl7.org/fhir/valueset-administrative-gender.html#expansion

view this post on Zulip JP (Feb 03 2020 at 01:40):

@Isaac Vetter - Looks to me like "Male" is the appropriate display or definition but "male" is the value of the actual code.
https://www.hl7.org/fhir/codesystem-administrative-gender.html#administrative-gender-male

view this post on Zulip Dennis Patterson (Feb 03 2020 at 02:07):

Alright folks, I put out a first draft of the track write-up. Have a look and let me know if there's anything you'd like to add/update!


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC