Stream: cimi
Topic: Naming Isosemantic Models
Mark Kramer (Jun 22 2017 at 20:49):
The question concerns how CIMI should refer to "Preferred" and "Non-Preferred" isosemantic models. There is some objection to calling them "Preferred" because that depends on your point of view (if you are querying a database, you might prefer a fully post-coordinated model, but if you are a clinician, you might prefer a precoordinated model because you only need to enter one code). One proposal is "Normal analysis form" or "canonical" similar words to indicate the analysis-friendly form. Any other opinions?
Grahame Grieve (Jun 22 2017 at 21:06):
which question? Can you provide a little more context?
Mark Kramer (Jun 27 2017 at 17:11):
The question I'm posing here, namely, what should we call the normative/preferred/canonical isosemantic model? It is a naming question, only.
Grahame Grieve (Jun 28 2017 at 03:31):
the master model?
Grahame Grieve (Jun 28 2017 at 03:31):
is that the right answer to the right question?
Michael van der Zel (Jul 05 2017 at 13:52):
In CIMI we talked about the preferred model or the referent index model (from MDMI).
Grahame Grieve (Jul 06 2017 at 21:03):
'referent index model' would be particularly obscure to those not in the no
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
